Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorByass, Peter
dc.contributor.authorWilder-Smith, Annelies
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-06T15:39:02Z
dc.date.available2022-09-06T15:39:02Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(16)00519-5/fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12663/3015
dc.description.abstractWhen the Zika virus outbreak was declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on Feb 1, 2016, the WHO International Health Regulations Emergency Committee made several recommendations. One of them was for increased research into the aetiology of clusters of microcephaly and its link to Zika virus.1 Quantification of microcephaly incidence is now a pressing requirement to estimate the proportion of cases that might be attributable to Zika virus infection. However, most countries that are at risk of Zika virus transmission because of the presence of Aedes mosquitoes have weak health-care systems and even weaker surveillance systems. In particular, they do not have detailed death registers for neonates or systematic reporting of head circumference for births. Therefore, it is important to piece together all available historical evidence to understand the current situation.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectZika Research Projecten_US
dc.subjectZika Virusen_US
dc.subjectZika Virus Infectionen_US
dc.subjectMicrocephalyen_US
dc.titleUtilising additional sources of information on microcephalyen_US
eihealth.countryOthersen_US
eihealth.categoryEpidemiology and epidemiological studiesen_US
eihealth.typeResearch protocol informationen_US
eihealth.maincategorySave Lives / Salvar Vidasen_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalThe Lanceten_US
dc.contributor.corporatenameSweden. Umeå Universityen_US
dc.contributor.corporatenameSingapore. Nanyang Technological Universityen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record